Perez v. Graham

Perez v. Graham

Petitioner:	Victor Perez
Respondent:	Victor Graham
Case Number:	1:2016cv02977
Filed:	April 21, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Cayuga
Presiding Judge:	Analisa Torres
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 10, 2018	Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: for 28 Report and Recommendation. The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety. The Petition is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and to mail a copy of this order to pro se Petitioner. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/10/2018) (ama)
July 18, 2018	Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Victor Perez. In his habeas petition, Petitioner asserts the following claims, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated because: Petitioner's convict ion was obtained by use of evidence obtained pursuant to an "unlawful arrest;" as further set forth in this Order. For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner's habeas petition should be denied. Furthermore, because Petitioner has not mad e a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability should not be issued. Objections to R&R due by 8/1/2018 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 7/18/2018) (cf)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 10, 2018

Filing 30 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: for 28 Report and Recommendation. The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R & R in its entirety. The Petition is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and to mail a copy of this order to pro se Petitioner. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/10/2018) (ama)

July 18, 2018

Filing 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Victor Perez. In his habeas petition, Petitioner asserts the following claims, alleging that his constitutional rights were violated because: Petitioner's convict ion was obtained by use of evidence obtained pursuant to an "unlawful arrest;" as further set forth in this Order. For the foregoing reasons, Petitioner's habeas petition should be denied. Furthermore, because Petitioner has not mad e a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability should not be issued. Objections to R&R due by 8/1/2018 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang on 7/18/2018) (cf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Graham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Victor Perez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Victor Graham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?