Loucks v. Capra

Loucks v. Capra

Petitioner:	Robert Loucks
Respondent:	Michael Capra
Case Number:	1:2016cv03115
Filed:	April 26, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Westchester
Presiding Judge:	Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 4, 2019	Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendations, The Court adopts the legal analysis and conclusions of MJ McCarthy's R & R. Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and the Petition is DISMISSED. For the reasons stated above, the Court adopts MJ McCarthy's R & R analysis and conclusions of law in its entirety. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to enter Judgment consiste nt with the R & R (dismissing the petition), to mail a copy of this Order and subsequent judgment of dismissal to Petitioner at the last address listed on ECF, and to show proof of service on the docket. As Petitioner has not made a substantial s howing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005); Lozada v. United States, 107 F.3d 1011, 1017 (2d Cir. 1997), abrog ated on other grounds by United States v. Perez, 129 F.3d 225, 259-60 (2d Cir. 1997). The Court certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 10/4/2019) (rj) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Date Filed

Document Text

October 4, 2019

Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 17 Report and Recommendations, The Court adopts the legal analysis and conclusions of MJ McCarthy's R & R. Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and the Petition is DISMISSED. For the reasons stated above, the Court adopts MJ McCarthy's R & R analysis and conclusions of law in its entirety. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to enter Judgment consiste nt with the R & R (dismissing the petition), to mail a copy of this Order and subsequent judgment of dismissal to Petitioner at the last address listed on ECF, and to show proof of service on the docket. As Petitioner has not made a substantial s howing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005); Lozada v. United States, 107 F.3d 1011, 1017 (2d Cir. 1997), abrog ated on other grounds by United States v. Perez, 129 F.3d 225, 259-60 (2d Cir. 1997). The Court certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 10/4/2019) (rj) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Loucks v. Capra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Loucks
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Capra
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?