Melbourne Municipal Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund v. Express Scripts Holding Company et al
Melbourne Municipal Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund |
Express Scripts Holding Company, George Paz, Timothy Wentworth, Eric Slusser, David Queller and James M. Havel |
1:2016cv03338 |
May 4, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Kimba M. Wood |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 114 OPINION AND ORDER re: 107 MOTION to Dismiss The Second Amended Class Action Complaint: For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 107, and close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/21/2018) (jwh) |
Filing 93 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 72 MOTION to Dismiss The Amended Class Action Complaint: This consolidated putative class action arises out of the breakdown of the business relationship between Express Scripts Holding Company ("Express Scripts"), a provider of pharmacy benefit services, and Anthem, Inc. ("Anthem"), its largest customer. Lead Plaintiff, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America ("TIAA"), an Express Scripts shareholder, asserts c auses of action individually and on behalf of others similarly situated for violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act (and Rule 10b5 promulgated thereunder) and violations of Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Plaintiff generally alleges that E xpress Scripts made false and misleading statements in its public filings and comments regarding the state of its relationship with Anthem. Defendants Express Scripts, George Paz, Timothy Wentworth, Eric Slusser, David Queller, and James M. Havel (th e "Individual Defendants," and with Express Scripts, "Defendants") bring this motion to dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint (the "CAC") for failure to state a claim. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants 9; motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the pleading by August 30, 2017. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the Motion, Doc. 72, and Defendants' request for oral argument, Doc. 84. (Amended Pleadings due by 8/30/2017.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/31/2017) (jwh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.