Lopez v. United States of America
| Amaury Lopez, Jr |
| United States of America |
| 1:2016cv03342 |
| May 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul A. Crotty |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER Movant's Second Motion is therefore DISMISSED. The Court of Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Movant and close ECF No. 231. As the motion makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 11/2/2022) (jca)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Movant. In the interest of justice, the Court transfers this motion under § 2255 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631; see also Liriano v. United States, 95 F.3d 119, 122-23 (2d Cir. 1996) (per curiam). This order supersedes the provision of Rule 83.1 of the Local Rules for the Southern District of New York that requires a seven-day delay before the Clerk of Cour t may effectuate the transfer of the case to the transferee court. This order closes this case. If the Court of Appeals authorizes Movant to proceed in this matter, he shall move to reopen this case under this civil docket number. As the motio n makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal fr om this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 2/22/2022) (tg) Transmission to Appeals Clerk. Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
11
OPINION & ORDER re: 9 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 8 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Amaury Lopez, Jr. Amaury Lopez Jr. moves pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) for reconsideration of the Court's April 20, 2017 Opinion and Order (as further set forth in this Order.) The motion for reconsideration is DENIED. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment, terminate all pending motions, and close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 6/27/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers (cf)
|
|
Filing
8
OPINION & ORDER re: 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Amaury Lopez, Jr. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Petitioners' § 2255 motions, and DENIES Lopez Jr.&# 039;s subsequent motions to amend. As Petitioners have not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," a certificate of appealability will not issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 4/20/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lopez v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Aimee Hector |
| Represented By: | David Zhou |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Amaury Lopez, Jr | |
| Represented By: | Edward John Rymsza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
