Padilla v. United States of America

Padilla v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Eladio Padilla
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	1:2016cv03622
Filed:	May 12, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Denny Chin
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 24, 2021	Filing 17 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 16 Memorandum & Opinion. in favor of United States of America against Eladio Padilla. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Decision dated March 24, 202 1, Padilla has failed to show a basis for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Accordingly, his petition for relief is denied. Because he has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, The Court declines to issue a certifi cate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (1996) (as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal taken from this order would not be taken in good faith; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 3/24/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt)
April 29, 2020	Filing 10 ORDER granting 9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 4/29/2020) (rj)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 24, 2021

Filing 17 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 16 Memorandum & Opinion. in favor of United States of America against Eladio Padilla. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Decision dated March 24, 202 1, Padilla has failed to show a basis for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Accordingly, his petition for relief is denied. Because he has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, The Court declines to issue a certifi cate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (1996) (as amended by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal taken from this order would not be taken in good faith; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 3/24/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt)

April 29, 2020

Filing 10 ORDER granting 9 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 4/29/2020) (rj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Padilla v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Eladio Padilla
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?