In Re: Motors Liquidation Company
| Motors Liquidation Company |
| Marlos Chenault and Shayrika L. Chenault |
| General Motors LLC |
| 1:2016cv03764 |
| May 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Ronnie Abrams |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
OPINION & ORDER re: 3 MOTION for Leave to Appeal filed by Marlos Chenault, Shayrika L. Chenault. Movants Marlos Chenault and Shayrika L. Chenault move for leave to appeal an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern Dist rict of New York, which determined that General Motors Corporation's Chapter 11 petition stayed their state-court action. (As further set forth in this Order.) In sum, the Bankruptcy Court's finding that New GM did not assume liability f or Movants' claims does not "involve[] a controlling question of law" and thus provides no basis for the Court to hear this appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Even if it did, the Court finds no "substantial ground for difference of opinion" on the question of whether New GM assumed liability for Movants' claims. For the foregoing reasons, the motion for leave to appeal is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 2/21/2017) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
