Comcast Corporation et al v. Rovi Corporation et al
| Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, Comcast of Houston, LLC, Comcast Business Communications, LLC, Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Shared Services LLC and Comcast STB Software I, LLC |
| Rovi Corporation, Rovi Guides, Inc., Rovi Technologies Corp. and Veveo, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv03852 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0001 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 90 MOTION for Reconsideration Notice of Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's December 14, 2016 Opinion and Order filed by Comcast STB Software I, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Comcast C able Communications, LLC, Comcast of Houston, LLC, Comcast Shared Services LLC, Comcast Business Communications, LLC, Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC. For the foregoing reasons, Comcast's motion for reconsideration of the Court's December 14, 2016, order and Comcasts' and ARRIS's motions to stay are DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 90. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 5/15/2017) (ama)
|
|
Filing
84
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Comcast's motion to enjoin Rovi from prosecuting its action pending before the ITC is DENIED. Comcast's motion for a stay pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a) is GRANTED as to the seven patents asserted in the ITC until the ITC action is terminated or any determination of the ITC becomes final. The parties are directed to file a letter with the Court by December 23, 2016, indicating the parties' views as to how the action should proceed, including whether either party intends to move to stay the remainder of the case or whether Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 12/14/2016) (ama)
|
|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER re: 57 LETTER MOTION to Stay addressed to Judge J. Paul Oetken from Dana M. Seshens dated 6/22/2016. filed by Comcast STB Software I, LLC, Comcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast of Houston, LLC, Comcast Shared Services LLC, Comcast Business Communications, LLC, Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, 49 MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Motion To Dismiss, Or Alternatively, Stay Or Transfer Comcasts Later Filed Declaratory Judgment Action filed by Rovi Technologies Corp., Rovi Corporation, Veveo, Inc., Rovi Guides, Inc., 25 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Comcast STB Software I, LLC, Co mcast Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast of Houston, LLC, Comcast Shared Services LLC, Comcast Business Communications, LLC, Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC. For the foregoin g reasons, and based on all arguments at the preliminary injunction hearing, the Court concludes that the first-filed rule applies in this case, and that the EDTX is best positioned, in the first instance, to decide whether any exceptions should trum p that rule. Because the EDTX has yet to rule on the pending motions, however, the Court determines that it would inappropriate to dismiss or transfer this action at this time. Accordingly, Defendant Rovi's motion to dismiss, or alternatively, s tay or transfer is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The request for a stay is granted and this matter is hereby STAYED pending a ruling by the Eastern District of Texas on the pending motions to transfer. In other respects the motion is denied wit hout prejudice. Comcast's motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED without prejudice, and Comcast's motion for a stay pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a) is DENIED as moot.The parties are directed to update the Court as to the status of the EDTX action within sixty days of the date of this Order, and every sixty days thereafter, until that action is resolved. Should the EDTX court render a final judgment, the parties are directed to notify the Court within thirty days. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Numbers 25, 49 and 57.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 9/16/2016) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
