Gaton v. United States of America

Gaton v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Christian Gaton
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	1:2016cv03868
Filed:	May 24, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Ronald L. Ellis
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 6, 2018	Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER: Having carefully considered Gatons claims, his § 2255 motion is DENIED. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability as Gaton has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S. C. § 2253. Thus, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to the pro se Petitioner and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 11/6/2018) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
September 13, 2017	Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Christian Gaton. Based on the foregoing, Gaton's motion to amend his Complaint is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED t hat Gaton amend his Complaint on or before October 16, 2017. The Government shall respond on or before October 30, 2017. Gaton's reply, if any, shall be due on or before November 13, 2017. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 9/13/2017) Copies Mailed by Chambers. (mro)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 6, 2018

Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER: Having carefully considered Gatons claims, his § 2255 motion is DENIED. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability as Gaton has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S. C. § 2253. Thus, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to the pro se Petitioner and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 11/6/2018) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

September 13, 2017

Filing 11 OPINION AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Christian Gaton. Based on the foregoing, Gaton's motion to amend his Complaint is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED t hat Gaton amend his Complaint on or before October 16, 2017. The Government shall respond on or before October 30, 2017. Gaton's reply, if any, shall be due on or before November 13, 2017. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald L. Ellis on 9/13/2017) Copies Mailed by Chambers. (mro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaton v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Elizabeth Anna Hanft
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Christian Gaton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?