The City Club of New York et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
| The City Club of New York, Robert Buchanan and Tom Fox |
| United States Army Corps of Engineers, David A. Caldwell, Hudson River Park Trust and Pier55, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv03934 |
| May 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Lorna G. Schofield |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 50 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment (jointly filed by all defendants). filed by Pier55, Inc., David A. Caldwell, Hudson River Park Trust, United States Army Corps of Engineers, 48 MOTION for Summary Ju dgment filed by The City Club of New York, Robert Buchanan, Tom Fox, 21 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction . MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by The City Club of New York, Robert Buchanan, Tom Fox. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction is DENIED as moot. The Permit is vacated and remanded to the Corps for proceedings consistent with this Opinion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions at Docket Nos. 21, 48 and 50 and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 3/23/2017) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
