Fu v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Fu v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Fu v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Anna Fu
Defendant:	Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2016cv04017
Filed:	May 29, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 25, 2020	Filing 108 OPINION & ORDER re: 66 MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Defendant's motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at Docket Entry 66 and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 3/25/2020) (va) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
September 13, 2018	Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER re: 45 LETTER MOTION for Discovery dismissing the complaint because Plaintiff failed to appear for the court-ordered deposition scheduled for January 17, 2018 addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Richard Levin dated January 17, 2018 filed by Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons: (1) defendant's motion to dismiss is denied; (2) defendant's motion for monetary sanctions is granted; (3) defendant sh all submit contemporaneous time records and supporting documentation to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs no later than thirty (30) days from the issuance of this Order and (4) absent an agreement between the parties, plaintiff is h ereby ORDERED to appear for her deposition at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York on Friday, September 28, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. Should the parties agree to an alternative date, that date shall be no later than thirty (30) days from the issuance of this Order. PLAINTIFF IS WARNED THAT AN UNJUSTIFIED FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR THIS DEPOSITION WILL RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE THE DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/13/2018) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ne)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 25, 2020

Filing 108 OPINION & ORDER re: 66 MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Defendant's motion for summary judgment. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at Docket Entry 66 and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 3/25/2020) (va) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

September 13, 2018

Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER re: 45 LETTER MOTION for Discovery dismissing the complaint because Plaintiff failed to appear for the court-ordered deposition scheduled for January 17, 2018 addressed to Judge Ronnie Abrams from Richard Levin dated January 17, 2018 filed by Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Accordingly, for all the foregoing reasons: (1) defendant's motion to dismiss is denied; (2) defendant's motion for monetary sanctions is granted; (3) defendant sh all submit contemporaneous time records and supporting documentation to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs no later than thirty (30) days from the issuance of this Order and (4) absent an agreement between the parties, plaintiff is h ereby ORDERED to appear for her deposition at 4 Irving Place, New York, New York on Friday, September 28, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. Should the parties agree to an alternative date, that date shall be no later than thirty (30) days from the issuance of this Order. PLAINTIFF IS WARNED THAT AN UNJUSTIFIED FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR THIS DEPOSITION WILL RESULT IN FURTHER SANCTIONS, WHICH MAY INCLUDE THE DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 9/13/2018) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ne)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fu v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna Fu
Represented By:	Matthew J. Blit
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?