Biocad JSC v. F. Hoffman La-Roche Ltd. et al
| Biocad JSC |
| F. Hoffman La-Roche Ltd., Genentech, Inc. and R-Farm JSC |
| 1:2016cv04226 |
| June 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Richard J. Sullivan |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for sanctions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Biocad shall pay to Defendants the total amount of attorneys' fees and costs involved in r esponding to Biocad's unfounded allegations brought under the Robinson-Patman Act. Because the Robinson-Patman discussion made up approximately 4% of the total pages that Defendants collectively spent responding to Biocad's Amended Complaint and in their moving for sanctions, see Doc. Nos. 52, 55, 57, 65, 66, 67, and 72, fees will be limited proportionally. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file submissions setting forth the total cost of the motion for sanctions a nd their respective motions to dismiss (including reply briefs) no later than February 11, 2022. Plaintiffs may respond to Defendants submissions no later than February 25, 2022. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Doc. No. 71. ( Motions due by 2/11/2022., Responses due by 2/25/2022) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 1/28/2022) Sitting by Designation. (ate) Modified on 1/28/2022 (ate).
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants shall supplement their motion for sanctions and attorneys' fees in light of the appeal no later than December 18, 2019, and Plaintiffs shall respond no later than January 15, 2020. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 1/15/2020) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 11/27/19) (yv)
|
|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER re: 56 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Genentech, Inc., 53 MOTION to Dismiss / Notice of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by R-Farm JSC, 51 MOTION t o Dismiss The Amended Complaint filed by F. Hoffman La-Roche Ltd., Roche Holding AG. Because Plaintiff has failed to plead an antitrust injury, because the foreign locus of Plaintiff's claims place them outside the reach of U.S. an titrust law, and because Plaintiff has not demonstrated a significant threat of injury from an impending violation of the antitrust laws, Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED, and Plaintiff's request for leave to amend the First Amended Complaint is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 51, 53, and 56, and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 9/30/2017) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
