McDonough v. The Department of the City School District of New York et al
Lane McDonough |
The Department of the City School District of New York and Paul DiDio |
1:2016cv04272 |
June 10, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Queens |
James L. Cott |
Laura Taylor Swain |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 33 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by The Department of the City School District of New York, Paul DiDio. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is granted in part and denied in part. As to Defendant DOE, the Court denies the motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First and Fourth Claims for Relief, but grants the motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second, Third, Fifth, and Sixth Claims for Relief. As to Defendant DiDio, the Court grants the motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First and Fourth Claims for Relief, and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of Plaintiff's Second, Third, Fifth, and Sixth Claims for Relief. This case is referred to Mag istrate Judge Cott for general pre-trial management. The parties are directed to contact Judge Cott's chambers to make arrangements for an initial pre-trial conference. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves Docket Entry No. 33. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 9/27/2018) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.