Rivera v. United States of America
| Hector Rivera |
| United States of America |
| 1:2016cv04600 |
| June 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Loretta A. Preska |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons set out above, Petitioner's motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (dkt. no. 322) is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the open motions (dkt. no. 322 in 08-cr-1327; dkt. no. 1 in 16-cv-4600) and close case number 16-cv-4600. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to Mr. Rivera. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/26/2022) (ks) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER: By order dated September 8, 2021 (dkt. no. 348 in 8-cr-1327, dkt. no. 5 in 16-cv-4600), the Court ordered the parties to inform the Court by letter no later than September 15, 2021 of the status of the action/remaining claims/defendants. To date, the Court has not received a response. The parties shall submit an update to the Court by letter no later than November 5, 2021. Failure to respond to the Court's order may result in dismissal of the civil action for failure to prosecute. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 11/2/2021) (va)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER: On August 17, 2016, the Court entered an order holding Defendant Hector Riveras § 2255 petition in abeyance pending (1) a decision from the Court of Appeals in United States v. Barrett (14-2641) and (2) a decision on a request for cer tiorari or rehearing in United States v. Hill (14-3872). On August 30, 2019, the Court of Appeals resolved the former. See United States v. Barrett, 937 F.3d 126 (2d Cir. 2019). On January 7, 2019, the Supreme Court resolved the latter. See Hill v. U nited States, 139 S. Ct. 844 (2019). In light of those developments, Plaintiff and Counsel shall confer and inform the Court by letter no later than September 15, 2021 of the status of the action/remaining claims/defendants. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/8/2021) (va)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: Plaintiff and Counsel shall confer and inform Judge Preska by letter no later than March 13, 2020 of the status of the action/remaining claims/defendants. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/02/2020) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rivera v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hector Rivera | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer L Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
