In Re: Cinque Terre Financial Group Limited
Cinque Terre Financial Group Limited |
Richard Rothenberg |
Cinque Terre Financial Group Limited |
1:2016cv04774 |
June 21, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Laura Taylor Swain |
Appeal |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: (17 in 1:16-cv-04774-LTS) LETTER MOTION to Consolidate Cases 16-cv-7700, 16-cv-4774 addressed to Judge Laura Taylor Swain from Andrew St. Laurent dated November 2, 2016. filed by Richard Rothenberg . For the foregoing reasons, the June Order is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and these matters are remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion, including a determination as to whether Rothenberg was employed by CTFG as CFO or in any other capacity on and after May 19, 2016, the date on which his resignation email was sent. If the Bankruptcy Court determines that Rothenberg was not holding CTFG's information in a representative capacity as of that time, the June Or der should be vacated as moot, and the Contempt Order vacated as well. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry no. 17 in case no. 16 CV 4774. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the above-captioned cases. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/28/2016) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.