Held & Hines LLP v. Hussain

Held & Hines LLP v. Hussain

Plaintiff:	Held & Hines LLP
Defendant:	Sandy Hussain
Case Number:	1:2016cv05273
Filed:	July 1, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Jed S. Rakoff
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 27, 2019	Filing 134 ORDER re: 128 Report and Recommendations: Accordingly, the Court hereby grants in part and denies in part H&H's motion for quantum meruit damages. Held & Hines is awarded $326,157.20 in attorneys' fees and $13,845.01 in expens es, plus pre-judgment interest from the date of the termination of the representation, April 15, 2016, in the amount of $105,663.56. The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment and close this case. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 9/27/2019) (jwh) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
September 5, 2018	Filing 117 ORDER adopting 115 Report and Recommendations, 105 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Held & Hines LLP On July 31, 2018, the Honorable Sarah Netburn, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the. abov e-captioned matter recommending (1) denying the motion of plaintiff Held & Hines, LLP ("H&H") for summary judgment with respect to H&H's breach of conduct claim and dismissing that claim sua sponte, but (2) granting the motion with respect to H&H's claim for quantum meruit damages and conducting a damages hearing to determine the reasonable value of the services H&H provided. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on August 14, 2018, but defendant Sandy Hu ssain received an extension from the Court to submit his objections. By letter dated August 21, 2018 and received by the Court on August 23, 2018, defendant submitted objections to certain portions of the Report and Recommendation. The Court has revi ew~d the objections and the underlying record de novo. Having done so, the Court finds itself in complete agreement with Magistrate Judge Netburn's excellent Report and Recommendation and hereby adopts its reasoning by reference. Acco rdingly, the Court hereby grants in part and denies in part H&H's motion for summary judgment. Specifically, the Court denies the motion for summary judgment with respect to H&H's breach of contract claim and dismisses that claim sua spo nte; but grants the motion for summary judgment with respect to H&H's claim for quantum meruit damages, and orders that the parties contact Magistrate Judge Netburn's Chambers to schedule an inquest into the reasonable value of the services H&H provided. The Clerk is instructed to close docket number 105. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 9/4/2018) (mro)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 27, 2019

Filing 134 ORDER re: 128 Report and Recommendations: Accordingly, the Court hereby grants in part and denies in part H&H's motion for quantum meruit damages. Held & Hines is awarded $326,157.20 in attorneys' fees and $13,845.01 in expens es, plus pre-judgment interest from the date of the termination of the representation, April 15, 2016, in the amount of $105,663.56. The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment and close this case. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 9/27/2019) (jwh) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.

September 5, 2018

Filing 117 ORDER adopting 115 Report and Recommendations, 105 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Held & Hines LLP On July 31, 2018, the Honorable Sarah Netburn, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the. abov e-captioned matter recommending (1) denying the motion of plaintiff Held & Hines, LLP ("H&H") for summary judgment with respect to H&H's breach of conduct claim and dismissing that claim sua sponte, but (2) granting the motion with respect to H&H's claim for quantum meruit damages and conducting a damages hearing to determine the reasonable value of the services H&H provided. Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due on August 14, 2018, but defendant Sandy Hu ssain received an extension from the Court to submit his objections. By letter dated August 21, 2018 and received by the Court on August 23, 2018, defendant submitted objections to certain portions of the Report and Recommendation. The Court has revi ew~d the objections and the underlying record de novo. Having done so, the Court finds itself in complete agreement with Magistrate Judge Netburn's excellent Report and Recommendation and hereby adopts its reasoning by reference. Acco rdingly, the Court hereby grants in part and denies in part H&H's motion for summary judgment. Specifically, the Court denies the motion for summary judgment with respect to H&H's breach of contract claim and dismisses that claim sua spo nte; but grants the motion for summary judgment with respect to H&H's claim for quantum meruit damages, and orders that the parties contact Magistrate Judge Netburn's Chambers to schedule an inquest into the reasonable value of the services H&H provided. The Clerk is instructed to close docket number 105. (Signed by Judge Jed S. Rakoff on 9/4/2018) (mro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Held & Hines LLP v. Hussain
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Held & Hines LLP
Represented By:	Hillel Ira Parness
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sandy Hussain
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?