Franklin v. New York City et al
| Ronald L. Franklin |
| New York City, Bill De Blasio, Joseph Ponte and Maxsolaine Mingo |
| 1:2016cv05549 |
| July 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| James C. Francis |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
OPINION & ORDER adopting 31 Report and Recommendation granting 18 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Joseph Ponte, Maxsolaine Mingo, Bill De Blasio, New York City. Before the Court is the Februar y 10, 2017 Report and Recommendation of the Hon. James C. Francis, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending that the Court grant the motion to dismiss Franklin's Amended Complaint with prejudice. Dkt. 31 ("Report"). Careful review of Judge Francis's thorough and well-reasoned Report (as well as the Order to Amend) reveals no facial error in its conclusions, or indeed any error at all. The Report is, therefore, adopted in its entirety. For the r easons articulated in the Report, the Court dismisses Franklin's Complaint with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. The Court directs the Clerk to mail a copy of this decision to plaintiff at the address on file. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 2/27/2017) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
