John Harris P.C. v. Tobin et al
| John Harris P.C. |
| Gerald J. Tobin, Helene Tobin and Gerald J. Tobin P.A |
| 1:2016cv05610 |
| July 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 88 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Sur-reply in further opposition to defendants' motions for summary judgment and in limine addressed to Judge John G. Koeltl from John Harris dated July 6, 2017, filed by John Harris P.C. The request to file a sur-reply brief is denied. The Clerk is directed to close Docket No. 88, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/8/2017) (ap)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER #107052 re: 39 MOTION to Disqualify defendants' counsel. filed by John Harris P.C. The plaintiff has moved to disqualify attorney Robert Goldstein ("Goldstein"), and Goldstein's law firm, Epstein Becker & Green ("EBG"), from representing the defendants on the purported grounds that Goldstein will be required to be a witness against the defendants, and that his testimony would be prejudicial to the defendants. (As further set forth in this Order.) Accordingly, the motion is denied. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/21/2017) (cf) Modified on 2/21/2017 (ap).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
