Anders et al v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
Reggie Anders and Underdog Trucking, LL.C |
Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco Partnership and Does 1 through 9 |
1:2016cv05654 |
July 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Albany |
Vernon S. Broderick |
Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
05 U.S.C. ยง 75 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 OPINION & ORDER re: 109 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct 107 Memorandum & Opinion of the Court filed by Underdog Trucking, LL.C, Reggie Anders. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the open motion at Document 109. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 12/17/2018) (mro) |
Filing 107 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 89 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. filed by Cellco Partnership, Verizon Communications Inc. 85 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Reverend Al Sharpton. National Action Network.Because I find that Plaintiffs have not established the existence of a valid contract under New York law, the NAN and Verizon Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED and I dismiss Plaintiffs' breach of contract and tortious interference claims with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for Defendants and close this case. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 6/5/2018) (js) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.