Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security

Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Kevin Carr
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2016cv05877
Filed:	July 22, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	Vernon S. Broderick
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 12, 2018	Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER re: 16 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Commissioner of Social Security, 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Kevin Carr. I have reviewed the remainder of Magistrate Ju dge Francis's thorough Report and Recommendation for clear error and find none. Therefore, I adopt the Report in its entirety. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, (Doc. 11), is GRANTED, and the Commissioner's cross-moti on for judgment on the pleadings, (Doc. 16), is DENIED and this case is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the open motions and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 7/12/2018) (rro)
May 11, 2017	Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 16 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security; 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Kevin Carr. For these reasons, I recommend denying the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings, granting the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, an remanding this case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rules 72, 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from this date to file written objectionsto this Report and Recommendation. Such objections shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court, with extra copies delivered to the Chambers of the Honorable Vernon S. Broderick, Room 415, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007, and to the Chambers of the undersigned, Room 1960, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Failure to file timely objections will preclude appellate review. (Objections to R&R due by 5/25/2017.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/11/2017) Copies Transmitted this Date By Chambers. (anc)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 12, 2018

Filing 22 OPINION AND ORDER re: 16 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Commissioner of Social Security, 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Kevin Carr. I have reviewed the remainder of Magistrate Ju dge Francis's thorough Report and Recommendation for clear error and find none. Therefore, I adopt the Report in its entirety. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, (Doc. 11), is GRANTED, and the Commissioner's cross-moti on for judgment on the pleadings, (Doc. 16), is DENIED and this case is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the open motions and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 7/12/2018) (rro)

May 11, 2017

Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 16 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security; 11 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Kevin Carr. For these reasons, I recommend denying the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings, granting the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, an remanding this case to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rules 72, 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have fourteen (14) days from this date to file written objectionsto this Report and Recommendation. Such objections shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court, with extra copies delivered to the Chambers of the Honorable Vernon S. Broderick, Room 415, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York 10007, and to the Chambers of the undersigned, Room 1960, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. Failure to file timely objections will preclude appellate review. (Objections to R&R due by 5/25/2017.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 5/11/2017) Copies Transmitted this Date By Chambers. (anc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Carr
Represented By:	Daniel Berger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Leslie A. Ramirez-Fisher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?