Burgos v. San Miguel Transportation, Inc. et al
| Domingo Burgos |
| San Miguel Transportation, Inc. and Carlos Camarena |
| 1:2016cv05929 |
| July 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Sarah Netburn |
| Analisa Torres |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
OPINION & ORDER re: 10 MOTION to Approve Settlement filed by Domingo Burgos. For the foregoing reasons, the Court approves the parties' settlement agreement, pursuant to which Burgos is to recover two-thirds, or $5,000 , and his counsel is to retain one-third, or $2,500. This action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/14/2016) (mro)
|
|
Filing
11
OPINION & ORDER re: 10 MOTION to Approve Settlement , filed by Domingo Burgos. For the foregoing reasons, the Court holds the parties' motion in abeyance until such time as plaintiff submits the information detaile d above about plaintiff's counsel's work on this matter. The Court directs plaintiff's counsel to submit such information by Wednesday, December 7, 2016. (As further set forth in this Opinion) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/1/2016) (kl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
