Garson v. Garson
| James Garson |
| Robin Garson and Estate of Gerald P. Garson |
| 1:2016cv06167 |
| August 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket Entry 22. The parties are further ORDERED to file a joint Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order on or before July 17, 2017. SO ORDERED. re: 22 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Estate of Gerald P. Garson, Robin Garson. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/6/2017) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Estate of Gerald P. Garson, Robin Garson. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket Entry 22. The parties are further ORDERED to file a joint Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order on or before July 17, 2017. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 6/26/2017) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
