Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. P3 International Corporation
| Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. |
| P3 International Corporation |
| 1:2016cv06276 |
| August 8, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Alison J. Nathan |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
235
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER adopting 219 Report and Recommendations. Finding no error in the report and recommendation, the Court hereby ORDERS that the report and recommendation is adopted in full, and Defendant's objections are therefore overruled. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/12/2021) (vfr) Modified on 10/12/2021 (vfr).
|
|
Filing
229
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. P3 International's motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (Dkt. No. 209) is DENIED. SO ORDERED. re: 209 MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 11 filed by P3 International Corporation. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/2020) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
208
OPINION & ORDER re: 167 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 164 Memorandum & Opinion, . filed by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., 175 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 164 Memorandum & Opinion, . filed by P3 International C orporation. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of the Court's September 2018 Order is DENIED, and the Court clarifies that opinion as necessary in accordance with Defendant's motion for reconsideration. In lig ht of the parties' January 3, 2019 stipulation, which this Court so-ordered on January 8, 2019, all other claims in this action have been resolved. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in accordance with the Court's September 30, 2018 Order as to Plaintiffs claims based on the '207 and '626 patents and to close this case. Consistent with the parties' stipulation, the Court will retain jurisdiction over any subsequent application for an award of nontaxable costs and attorney's fees. As the magistrate judge denied Defendant's previous application for fees without prejudice on August 9, 2019, Defendant may refile any such motion in accordance with the magistrate judge's orders. Dkt. No. 207. This resolves Dkt. Nos. 167 and 175. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/16/2019) (kv) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
164
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is granted with respect to the '207 patent and with respect to the '626 patent and denied on its remaining grounds. Plaintiff' ;s motion for partial summary judgment is granted with respect to validity of the '006, '282, '693, and '867 patents and with respect to Defendant's waived affirmative defenses and counterclaims. Its motion for partial summar y judgment with respect to the '207 patent is denied as moot. Its motion for summary judgment on damages is denied. This resolves Docket Nos. 134, 147, and 149. A status conference will be scheduled by separate order. SO ORDERED. re: 149 MO TION for Summary Judgment filed by P3 International Corporation, 147 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File redacted versions of attachments A and B addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Michael B. Eisenberg dated Jan. 31, 2018 filed by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd., 134 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (rjm)
|
|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 123 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 116 Order on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, with Alternative Request for Pre-motion Conference, filed by P3 International Corporation. Defendant's motion for reconsideration of the Court's September 22 Order is DENIED. This resolves Dkt. No. 123, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/12/2018) (ras)
|
|
Filing
130
OPINION & ORDER: re: 114 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 112 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. The Court denies plaintiff's motion for reconsideration. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion at ECF No. 114, and as further set forth in this order. Motions terminated: 114 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 112 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 11/29/2017) (ap)
|
|
Filing
112
OPINION & ORDER: Accordingly, both the plain text of the '693 Patent and its specification describe an intervening buffer layer between the substrate and the first conductive semiconductor layer, such that the use of on contemplates one layer being positioned or placed above the other but with no direct contact (i.e., with an intervening layer "disposed between"). In other words, even with a buffer layer placed between the first conductive semiconductor layer and the substra te layer, Claim 1 still describes the first conductive semiconductor layer as "on" the substrate layer. Accordingly, the Court adopts the following definition of "on": "directly on or directly connected to the other element or layer, or intervening elements or layers may be present." This claim-construction ruling will govern all subsequent proceedings. The parties shall confer and inform the court by joint letter, to be submitted by no later than September 15, 2017, as to how they propose to proceed, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 9/11/2017) (ap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. v. P3 International Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Micheal Bradley Eisenberg |
| Represented By: | Merri Carole Moken |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: P3 International Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
