Castillo Marcelino et al v. 374 Food Inc. et al
| Domingo Castillo Marcelino |
| 374 Food Inc., Tiran Tsadok and Hayim Tsadok |
| 1:2016cv06287 |
| August 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER: As a final matter, the Court wishes to express its sincere gratitude to Defendants and their counsel for their diligent efforts in bringing this case to a just resolution. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pendingmotions, adjour n all remaining dates, and close this case. Plaintiffs former counsel is ORDERED to transmit this message to Plaintiff through whatever means they were last able to contact him. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal b y Plaintiff from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) and further set forth in this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 1/24/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER: Therefore, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's award of judgment is hereby forfeited. Additionally, the Court finds that Defendants and their counsel have incurred costs as a result of Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this case and respond to the Court's orders, and that they are entitled to reimbursement for those costs from Plaintiff. The Court therefore invites Defendants and their counsel, if they wish, to petition the Court for a reimbursement of costs by Januar y 11, 2020. Finally, Plaintiff's former counsel is ORDERED to transmit this message to Plaintiff through whatever means they were last able to contact him. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal by Plaintiff from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 12/11/2019) (rro)
|
|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court wishes to hear from the parties concerning next steps in light of all of the findings contained in this Opinion. As a result, it ORDERS the parties to submit briefing of no more than 20 pages on the following issues he rein. Defendants' brief is due on or before April 30, 2018. Plaintiff's responsive brief is due on or before May 30, 2018. No reply brief is requested at this time. Brief due by 4/30/2018. Responses to Brief due by 5/30/2018. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 3/27/2018) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
