Taebel v. Sonberg

Taebel v. Sonberg

Petitioner:	Mitchell Taebel
Respondent:	Justice Michael Sonberg
Case Number:	1:2016cv06337
Filed:	August 10, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Colleen McMahon
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 5, 2018	Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendations: In sum, this Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Cott's extremely thorough and well-reasoned Report, and finds that it is not erroneous on its face. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (C). Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report in its entirety and dismisses Taebel's petition. Taebel also filed two motions requesting that this Court subpoena any complaints against Justice Michael Sonberg. Those applications are denied. Fin ally, this Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at ECF Nos. 21 and 23 and to mark this case as closed. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 6/5/2018) (jwh)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 5, 2018

Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendations: In sum, this Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Cott's extremely thorough and well-reasoned Report, and finds that it is not erroneous on its face. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (C). Accordingly, this Court adopts the Report in its entirety and dismisses Taebel's petition. Taebel also filed two motions requesting that this Court subpoena any complaints against Justice Michael Sonberg. Those applications are denied. Fin ally, this Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at ECF Nos. 21 and 23 and to mark this case as closed. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 6/5/2018) (jwh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taebel v. Sonberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mitchell Taebel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Justice Michael Sonberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?