National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. v. Source One Staffing LLC
Petitioner: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.
Respondent: Source One Staffing LLC
Case Number: 1:2016cv06461
Filed: August 15, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Jesse M. Furman
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 5 Petition to Appoint Arbitrator
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 52 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment, filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Accordingly, the Court grants Petitioners unopposed petition to confirm t he entire Award. Petitioner is directed to submit a proposed Judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order to the Orders and Judgments Clerk of this Court by December 18, 2017, and as further set forth in this order. Motions terminated: 52 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award and Enter Judgment, filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 12/11/2017) (ap)
May 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 40 MOTION to Stay re: 39 MOTION to Stay . MOTION to Vacate Arbitration . , filed by Source One Staffing LLC, 39 MOTION to Stay . MOTION to Vacate Arbit ration , filed by Source One Staffing LLC, 42 CROSS MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award, filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA., 41 MOTION to Stay re: 40 MOTION to Stay re: 39 M OTION to Stay . MOTION to Vacate Arbitration . , 39 MOTION to Stay . MOTION to Vacate Arbitration . , filed by Source One Staffing LLC, 33 CROSS MOTION to Confirm Arbitration Award, filed by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Source One's motion for a stay of arbitration and to vacate the interim award is DENIED, and National Union's cross-motion to confirm the interim award is GRAN TED. One issue remains: National Union's submissions are heavily redacted. (See Docket Nos. 43, 44). National Union contends that the redactions are proper because the redacted materials refer to information contained in the parties' Con fidentiality Order. (Docket No. 32). As this Court has held, however, "the mere fact that information is subject to a confidentiality agreement between litigants is not a valid basis to overcome the presumption in favor of public access to ju dicial documents." United States v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., No. 12-CV-7527 JMF, 2015 WL 3999074, at *4(S.D.N.Y. June 30, 2015) (citing cases). Moreover, this Memorandum Opinion and Order relies on (indeed, discloses) much of the redacted cont ent, which heightens the basis for public access. Accordingly, any party that believes that the papers should remain publicly filed only in redacted form shall file a letter brief, not to exceed five pages and no later than May 31, 2017, addressin g the propriety of doing so. See, e.g., Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006) (discussing the presumption in favor of public access). If no party files a brief justifying the maintenance of a particular document i n redacted form, National Union shall publicly file an un-redacted version of the document on ECF within two business days. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 33, 39, 40, 41, and 42. Further, as there is no reason to keep the c ase open pending the arbitration, the Clerk is directed to administratively close the case without prejudice to either party moving by letter motion to reopen the case within thirty days of the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/17/17) (yv)
October 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court exercises its authority under the FAA and the terms of the parties' arbitration agreement and appoints Elizabeth Thompson as umpire. As that is the sole relief sought by National Union, the Clerk of Cour t is directed to close the case, without prejudice to either party reopening it within thirty days if Ms. Thompson does not or cannot accept appointment as the umpire. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 10/13/2016) (kgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. v. Source One Staffing LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.
Represented By: Francesca Eva Brody
Represented By: Nicholas Primer Crowell
Represented By: Andrew Douglas Hart
Represented By: Francesca Eva Brody
Represented By: Nicholas Primer Crowell
Represented By: Andrew Douglas Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Source One Staffing LLC
Represented By: Alexander David Hardiman
Represented By: Matthew Francis Putorti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?