Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Latasha Monique Franklin
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	1:2016cv06478
Filed:	August 16, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Bronx
Presiding Judge:	Andrew L. Carter
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 23, 2018	Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER re: 16 CROSS MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security, 14 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Latasha Monique Franklin. This is an action chal lenging the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") final decision that Plaintiff Latasha Monique Franklin ("Plaintiff") is not entitled to disability insurance benefits ("DIB") and Supplemental Secur ity Income ("SSI") under Title II of the Social Security Act. Currently pending are Plaintiffs and Commissioner's cross motions for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c); as further set forth herein. The ALJ complied with the applicable legal standards and reached a decision that was supported by substantial evidence. For the above reasons, Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED and plaintiff's cross-motion is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/23/2018) (mro)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 23, 2018

Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER re: 16 CROSS MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security, 14 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Latasha Monique Franklin. This is an action chal lenging the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") final decision that Plaintiff Latasha Monique Franklin ("Plaintiff") is not entitled to disability insurance benefits ("DIB") and Supplemental Secur ity Income ("SSI") under Title II of the Social Security Act. Currently pending are Plaintiffs and Commissioner's cross motions for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c); as further set forth herein. The ALJ complied with the applicable legal standards and reached a decision that was supported by substantial evidence. For the above reasons, Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED and plaintiff's cross-motion is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 3/23/2018) (mro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franklin v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latasha Monique Franklin
Represented By:	Daniel Berger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?