Rowell v. City Of New York et al
| Hozie Rowell |
| City Of New York, Joan Ferreira, Shane Killilca, John Doe and Shane Killilea |
| 1:2016cv06598 |
| August 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Alison J. Nathan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
158
ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' letter describing their respective positions regarding the Court's March 3, 2022 Opinion and Order (Dkt. No. 157). The Court hereby orders the adoption of Defendants' proposed payment plan. Plaintiff shall pay the City of New York $100 per month for four years, with the last payment being $128.01. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/6/2022) (ks) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
|
|
Filing
156
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to uphold the bill of costs entered in Defendants' favor in the amount of $4,828.01. Execution of the bill of costs so entered is stayed for 30 days from the date upon which this Order appears on the ECF docket. This resolves docket number 149. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/3/2022) (vfr) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
155
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 149 MOTION to Vacate 148 Taxation of Costs, filed by Hozie Rowell. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter an order setting aside the award of costs in the amount of $4,828.0 1. Execution of the bill of costs so entered is stayed for 30 days from the date upon which this Order appears on the ECF docket. This resolves docket number 149. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/1/2022) (vfr) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
139
OPINION & ORDER re: 131 MOTION for New Trial . filed by Hozie Rowell. Plaintiff Hozie Rowell brings this motion for a new trial under Rule 59(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mr. Rowell contends that the verdict was seri ously erroneous or a manifest injustice because the sole juror of African-American appearance was struck. He also alleges that Defendants' counsel suborned perjury and made improper statements during her summation. Defendants oppose and move for sanctions. For the reasons given below, both parties' motions are DENIED. For the reasons given above, Mr. Rowell's motion for a new trial is hereby DENIED. Defendants' request for sanctions is hereby DENIED. This resolves docket item number 131. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/18/2019) (rj)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 76 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Christopher Popovic, Joan Ferreira, Shane Killilea. For the reasons given above, Defendants' motion for reconsideration is DENIED in its entirety. This resol ves docket item number 76. In addition, within one week of the date of this order, the parties shall submit a letter indicating whether they seek the Court's assistance in referring the parties to a magistrate judge or mediator for settlement. SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: 76 MOTION for Reconsideration . filed by Christopher Popovic, Joan Ferreira, Shane Killilea. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/22/2019) (kv)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 74 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument re: Motion for Summary Judgment addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Kavin Thadani dated March 20, 2018. filed by City Of New York, Christopher Popovic, Joan Ferreira, Shane Killilea, 60 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by City Of New York, Christopher Popovic, Joan Ferreira, Shane Killilea. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied with respect to Plaintiff's clai ms for denial of the right to a fair trial and failure to intervene. The motion for summary judgment is granted as to all other claims. Because the remaining claims are only brought against the individual Defendants, the City of New York is dismiss ed from the case. This resolves docket number 60. Because the Court has resolved the motion for summary judgment on the parties' papers, the motion for oral argument is denied as moot. This resolves docket number 74. A scheduling conference is hereby set for October 31, 2018 at 1 p.m. In advance of that conference, the parties shall confer and determine several mutually agreeable dates for trial and a proposed schedule for the filing of pre-trial materials. The parties shall also confe r regarding settlement and indicate to the Court in advance of the October 31 conference whether they seek a referral to either the Magistrate Judge or the Court-annexed Mediation Program. The parties shall file a status letter regarding proposed t rial dates and whether a settlement referral is requested by October 24, 2018. (As further set forth in this Order.) City Of New York terminated., (Scheduling Conference set for 10/31/2018 at 01:00 PM before Judge Alison J. Nathan.) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/28/2018) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
