The Carlton Group, Ltd. v. Mirabella SG SpA et al
The Carlton Group, Ltd. |
Mirabella SG SpA and Gruppo Mirabella SG, SpA |
1:2016cv06649 |
August 23, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Lorna G. Schofield |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 OPINION AND ORDER re: 88 MOTION for Reconsideration . filed by The Carlton Group, Ltd. Plaintiff moves for reconsideration. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket Number 88. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/25/2019) (cf) |
Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER re: 74 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by The Carlton Group, Ltd., 86 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Stephen B. Meister dated 11/22/2017. filed by The Carlton Group, Ltd., 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Mirabella SG SpA, 84 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Gregory A. Clarick dated November 22, 2017. filed by Mirab ella SG SpA.For the foregoing reasons, Mirabella's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Carlton's entitlement to a Commission or Restructuring Fee. Carlton's cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED, except GRANTED strikin g all affirmative defenses except the Ninth Affirmative Defenses (faithless servant doctrine). Carlton's claim for its Retainer Fees remains. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions at Dkt. Nos. 72, 74, 84 and 86. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 7/19/2018) (kgo) |
Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER re: 39 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by Mirabella SG SpA, 48 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Nicole Gueron dated April 21, 2017. filed by Mira bella SG SpA. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint is DENIED, and its request for fees and costs is accordingly DENIED. Defendant's motion for oral argument is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions at Docket Numbers 39 and 48. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 8/16/2017) (kgo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.