The Carlton Group, Ltd. v. Mirabella SG SpA et al
Plaintiff: The Carlton Group, Ltd.
Defendant: Mirabella SG SpA and Gruppo Mirabella SG, SpA
Case Number: 1:2016cv06649
Filed: August 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Lorna G. Schofield
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 93 OPINION AND ORDER re: 88 MOTION for Reconsideration . filed by The Carlton Group, Ltd. Plaintiff moves for reconsideration. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket Number 88. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 1/25/2019) (cf)
July 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 87 OPINION AND ORDER re: 74 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by The Carlton Group, Ltd., 86 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Stephen B. Meister dated 11/22/2017. filed by The Carlton Group, Ltd., 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Mirabella SG SpA, 84 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Gregory A. Clarick dated November 22, 2017. filed by Mirab ella SG SpA.For the foregoing reasons, Mirabella's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Carlton's entitlement to a Commission or Restructuring Fee. Carlton's cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED, except GRANTED strikin g all affirmative defenses except the Ninth Affirmative Defenses (faithless servant doctrine). Carlton's claim for its Retainer Fees remains. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions at Dkt. Nos. 72, 74, 84 and 86. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 7/19/2018) (kgo)
August 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 OPINION AND ORDER re: 39 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint. filed by Mirabella SG SpA, 48 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Nicole Gueron dated April 21, 2017. filed by Mira bella SG SpA. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Complaint is DENIED, and its request for fees and costs is accordingly DENIED. Defendant's motion for oral argument is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motions at Docket Numbers 39 and 48. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 8/16/2017) (kgo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Carlton Group, Ltd. v. Mirabella SG SpA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Carlton Group, Ltd.
Represented By: David Eric Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mirabella SG SpA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gruppo Mirabella SG, SpA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?