Garner et al v. Behrman Brothers IV, LLC et al
| Winifred Marie Garner and Sophia Theus |
| Behrman Brothers IV, LLC and Behrman Brothers Management Corp. |
| 1:2016cv06968 |
| September 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons above, the Court denies Behrman's motion to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7) and denies Behrman' s motion to drop both defendants under Rule 21. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to clos e the motions pending at Dkts. 40 and 42. The parties are directed to, within two weeks of this order, submit a joint letter to the Court outlining a proposed schedule for next steps in the case, which contemplates the completion of fact discovery within four months, and as further set forth in this order. Motions terminated: 40 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, filed by Behrman Brothers IV, LLC, Behrman Brothers Management Corp. 42 MOTION to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7), filed by Behrman Brothers IV, LLC, Behrman Brothers Management Corp. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/16/2017) (ap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
