Levitant v. Workers Compensation Board of the State of New York et al
| Zinoviy Levitant |
| Workers Compensation Board of the State of New York, Robert Beloten, The Commissioners of the Compensation Board, City Of New York and Zachary Carter Corporation |
| 1:2016cv06990 |
| September 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Levitant's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 11/7/2019) (kv)
|
|
Filing
68
OPINION AND ORDER re: 55 SECOND LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time TO FILE OPPOSITION addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from JOEL M. GLUCK dated 9/14/2017 filed by Zinoviy Levitant, 56 FIRST MOTION to Amend/Correct First Amended Complaint filed by Zinoviy Levitant, 41 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City Of New York, Zachary Carter, 43 MOTION to Dismiss (WCB Defendants' Notice of Motion to Dismiss) filed by Workers Compensation Board of the State of New York, The Commissioners of the New York State Workers Compensation Board. Accordingly, Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED and Plaintiff's motion to amend is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions (Docs. 41, 43, 55, 56), and to close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/8/2018) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
