Applebaum v. Lyft, Inc.

Applebaum v. Lyft, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Josh Applebaum
Defendant:	Lyft, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2016cv07062
Filed:	September 9, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit:	Other Fraud
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 26, 2017	Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the parties arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, Lyft's motion to compel arbitr ation pursuant to the FAA is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to close all pending motions. The parties should submit a proposed order to the Court by July 10, 2017, in accordance with this decision that directs the parties to arbitrate the ir dispute. If the parties cannot agree to a jointly proposed order, each party may submit a proposed order to the Court by July 10, 2017, and any objections to the other sides order by July 12, 2017. The action is stayed pending the resolution of the arbitration. See Katz v. Cellco P'ship, 794 F.3d 341, 343 (2d Cir. 2015) (The FAA "requires a stay of proceedings when all claims are referred to arbitration and a stay [is] requested."). (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/26/2017) (js)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 26, 2017

Filing 53 OPINION AND ORDER: The Court has considered all of the arguments of the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the parties arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, Lyft's motion to compel arbitr ation pursuant to the FAA is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to close all pending motions. The parties should submit a proposed order to the Court by July 10, 2017, in accordance with this decision that directs the parties to arbitrate the ir dispute. If the parties cannot agree to a jointly proposed order, each party may submit a proposed order to the Court by July 10, 2017, and any objections to the other sides order by July 12, 2017. The action is stayed pending the resolution of the arbitration. See Katz v. Cellco P'ship, 794 F.3d 341, 343 (2d Cir. 2015) (The FAA "requires a stay of proceedings when all claims are referred to arbitration and a stay [is] requested."). (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 6/26/2017) (js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Applebaum v. Lyft, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Josh Applebaum
Represented By:	Nealraj Bhushan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Lyft, Inc.
Represented By:	Jeffrey J. Amato
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?