Hercules Medical, P.C. v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
| Hercules Medical, P.C. |
| National Railroad Passenger Corporation |
| 1:2016cv07142 |
| September 13, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Paul G. Gardephe |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hercules Medical, P.C. v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hercules Medical, P.C. | |
| Represented By: | David Alan Etkind |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Donald L. Havermann |
| Represented By: | Melissa D Hill |
| Represented By: | Sean Kenneth McMahan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
