Janik et al v. Spin Media LLC
| Fran Janik and Steven Hirsch |
| Spin Media LLC |
| 1:2016cv07308 |
| September 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
OPINION & ORDER: re: 94 FIRST MOTION for Attorney Fees, filed by SMG Media, Inc. For the reasons set forth above, Spin's attorneys' fees motion (Dkt. No. 94) is DENIED, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck on 1/10/2018) (ap)
|
|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 80 MOTION to Set Aside 77 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, Objections to Rulings of Magistrate Judge Under Rule 72. filed by SMG Media, Inc. The Court has considered all of the arguments ra ised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, Spin Media's motion pursuant to Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted, the Magistrate Judge's decision regarding fees and costs as against Janik is vacated, and the matter is remanded for further consideration in light of this opinion. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 12/4/2017) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
