Lynch et al v. City Of New York et al
| Richard Lynch and Vienna Rye |
| City Of New York, Jonmichael Delarosa, Mariann Mandy, Andrew Lombardo, John Does and Richard Roes |
| 1:2016cv07355 |
| September 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Richmond |
| Loretta A. Preska |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER: It having been reported to this Court that a settlement conference was held and agreement was reached on all issues, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark this matter closed and all pending motions denied as moot; prov ided however, that if settlement is not consummated within 30 days of the date of this Order, either party may apply by letter within the 30-day period for reinstatement of the action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 6/9/2022) (va)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER granting 108 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File ; denying 108 Letter Motion for Conference re: 108 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File PreSettlement Conference Submission addressed to Magistrate Judge Barba ra C. Moses from Alan H. Scheiner dated May 31, 2022. LETTER MOTION for Conference to Allow Individual Defendant to Not Attend and Comptroller to be available by phone addressed to Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses from Alan H. Scheiner da ted May 31, 2022. Application GRANTED IN PART. Defendants' deadline to submit their pre-settlement conference letter is EXTENDED to June 2, 2022. Defendant Mandy is not required to attend the June 6, 2022 settlement conference. A representativ e of the Comptroller's Office must attend the remote settlement conference by Zoom at 2:15 p.m. when the conference is commenced. Whether the representative must remain on the call will be determined at that time. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses on 6/1/2022) (kv)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER granting 102 Letter Motion to Stay re: 102 JOINT LETTER MOTION to Stay joint letter motion for referral to the Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference, and to stay discovery until that process is completed addressed to Judge Loretta A. Preska from Jeffrey Rothman; Alan Scheiner. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/24/2022) (tg)
|
|
Filing
97
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 81 Motion to Quash. To the extent and for the reasons stated above, the motion to quash (dkt. no. 81) is DENIED and the motion for a protective order (dkt. no. 81) is GRANTED as detailed in Section III(C), above. The Clerk of the Court shall close the open motions (dkt. no. 81). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 11/4/2021) (va)
|
|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 87 Motion to Quash. For the reasons above, the Court exercises its discretion to stay the deposition of Lombardo until the termination of his deployment. Accordingly, to the extent described above, the City's mot ion to quash [dkt. no. 87] is GRANTED. The City shall notify the Court and Plaintiff when Lombardo has completed his deployment. The Clerk of the Court shall close the open motion. In light of this ruling, it is unnecessary, at this time, to resolve the City's remaining arguments regarding the substance of Lombardo's deposition. The City may reassert those arguments if and when Lombardo is ultimately deposed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/5/2021) (va)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER: As was discussed during a telephonic conference conducted on September 24, 2020, at 9 a.m., the following deadlines are set concerning the conduct of discovery in this case: (1) Interrogatories and document requests shall be served by October 1, 2020 (and may be served solely by email); (2) All fact discovery shall be completed by January 31, 2021 (with the parties to write the Court prior to that date with a proposal concerning the timing of expert discovery). (3) A telephonic status conference in this case shall be held on December 7 at 10:30 a.m. using dial-in (888) 363-4374, access code: 4645450. SO ORDERED. ( Fact Discovery due by 1/13/2021. Telephone Conference set for 12/7/2020 at 10:30 AM before Judge Loretta A. Preska.) (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/28/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER denying 68 Motion for Reconsideration. For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Lynch' motion for reconsideration (dkt. no. 69) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the open motion. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/25/2020) (rro)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER denying as moot 60 Letter Motion to Stay. To the extent they are not addressed above, the Court has considered the parties remaining arguments and finds them unavailing. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the FAC (dkt. nos. 57, 59) is DENIED. Defendants' motion to bifurcate is GRANTED, and their motion for a 90-day stay is DENIED as moot. The parties shall confer and advise the Court by letter no later than July 21 on how they propose to proceed. The Clerk of the Court shall close the open motion (dkt. no. 60). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 7/14/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER: In light of the Court of appeals' opinion, counsel shall confer and inform the Court by letter no later than April 24 how they propose to proceed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/17/2020) (va)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER. Counsel shall confer and report to the Court by letter no later than March 13, 2020 on how they propose to proceed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/6/20) (yv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
