First NBC Bank v. Murex LLC f/k/a Murex N.A. Ltd.
First NBC Bank |
Murex LLC f/k/a Murex N.A. Ltd. |
1:2016cv07703 |
September 30, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Paul A. Engelmayer |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 263 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court directs counsel to meet and confer, and to file on the docket of this case, by Monday, November 23, 2020, a joint letter setting forth in detail the parties' views as to the manner and timetable by which the open is sue(s) regarding remedy are to be litigated and resolved. The Court will then either issue an order setting a schedule going forward or, if the Court determines further discussion warranted, convene a prompt conference with counsel. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/12/2020) (jwh) |
Filing 134 OPINION & ORDER re: 120 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver For First NBC Bank, 132 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply addressed to Judge Paul A. E ngelmayer from Robert N. LeMay dated 09/21/2018. filed by Murex LLC. For the foregoing reasons, and because this is the plaintiffs third attempt to amend its complaint, FDIC's motion for leave to amend is denied with prejudice. The Court a lso declines the FDIC's invitation to reconsider its earlier decision dismissing the FDIC's LUTPA claim. Additionally, the Court denies as moot Murex's request to file a sur-reply to the FDIC's reply brief in support of its motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 120 and 132. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 11/7/2018) (anc) |
Filing 112 OPINION & ORDER re: 107 MOTION to Dismiss Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff FDIC as Receiver for First NBC Bank's Second Amended Complaint filed by Murex LLC. For the reasons stated above, t he Court grants Murex's motion to dismiss Counts II, V, and VII. The Court otherwise denies the motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion pending at Dkt. 107. Within one week of this decision, the parties are directed to submit a proposed case management plan consistent with the Court's individual rules. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 6/5/2018) (mro) |
Filing 92 OPINION & ORDER: The Court has reviewed the submissions of defendant Murex LLC ("Murex"), Dkt. 81-1, and substituted plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"), Dkt. 82, as to the issue of the access that counsel for the FDIC may properly have to the materials of Holland & Knight LLC (H&K), which, until its disqualification on April 28, 2017, Dkt. 74, represented initial plaintiff First NBC Bank ("FNBC"). The Court agrees that, given the taint attached to H&K by virtue of its separate representation of Murex and the exposure of H&K's lawyers in this matter to Murex's confidences, there are to be no substantive conversations between H&K and counsel for the FDIC. However, co unsel for the FDIC may receive H&K's legal files relating to its representation of FNBC, provided that these materials do not include any references, direct or indirect, to H&K's prior representation of Murex. The Court expects that H &K will task a senior litigator with responsibility for closely reviewing any such files to assure that any such references are identified and redacted before materials are shared with counsel for the FDIC. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 7/11/2017) (ap) |
Filing 74 OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated above, the Court grants Murex's motion to disqualify Holland and Knight. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 29. An order will follow shortly as to next steps in this case. SO ORDERED. re: 29 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Murex LLC. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 4/28/2017) (rjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.