Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Intrepid Group LLC et al
||Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
||Intrepid Group LLC, The City Of New York , and Steven Cardona
||October 11, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||XX Out of State
||John G. Koeltl
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2201
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 15, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 112 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 106 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, 108 FIRST MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by The City Of New Yo rk, 116 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Intrepid Group LLC. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co. ("Philadelphia") has filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order of March 26, 2018, in which the Court denied Philadelphia's motion for summary judgment, awarded summary judgment to Intrepid Group, LLC, and the City of New York, and directed the Clerk to enter judgment against Philadelphia. Dkt. No. 112; see Phila. Inde m. Ins. Co. v. Intrepid Grp., LLC, No. 16-cv-7928, 2018 WL 1517199 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2018). Intrepid and the City have separately moved for attorneys' fees. Dkt. Nos. 108, 116. Philadelphia's motion for reconsideration is denied with prej udice, and the motions for fees by Intrepid and the City are denied without prejudice; as further set forth herein. Philadelphia therefore fails to show the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice. Accordingly, Philad elphia's motion for reconsideration is denied. The motions for fees filed by Intrepid and the City are premature because Philadelphia may appeal the judgment in this case. The motions by Intrepid and the City are therefore denied without prejud ice and may be renewed thirty days after the time to appeal has expired or, if an appeal is taken, thirty days after a mandate issues from the Court of Appeals. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2)(B) advisory committee's notes to the 1993 amendment ("[T]he court under [Rule 54(d)(2)(B)] may effectively extend the period [for filing a motion for fees] by permitting claims to be filed after resolution of the appeal."). (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 5/15/2018) (mro)
|March 26, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Notice of Motion) filed by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, 67 MOTION to Dismiss filed by The City Of New York, 82 MOTION for Summary Ju dgment filed by Intrepid Group LLC. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed, the arguments are either moot or without merit. For the foregoing reasons, Intrepid's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(a) and the City's request for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 (f) (1) are granted; Philadelphia's motion for summary judgment is denied; and the City's motion to dismiss is dismissed as moot. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against Philadelphia, to close all pending motions, and to close this case. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/26/2018) (mml)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?