Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. Xerox Corporation et al
| Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System |
| Xerox Corporation, Ursula M. Burns, Luca Maestri, Kathryn A. Mikells, Lynn R. Blodgett and Robert K. Zapfel |
| 1:2016cv08260 |
| October 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
OPINION & ORDER re: 59 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed by Robert K. Zapfel; 65 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Mary Scanlon, Xerox Corporation, David H. Bywater, Kathryn A. Mikells, Ursula M. Burns, Luca Ma estri, Lynn R. Blodgett. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court grants defendants' motions to dismiss. Dkts. 59, 65. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 3/20/2018) (anc) Modified on 3/22/2018 (anc).
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION & ORDER re: 20 MOTION to Appoint IWA Forest Industry Pension Plan to serve as lead plaintiff(s) . MOTION to Appoint Counsel Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP as lead counsel filed by IWA Forest Industry Pension Plan, 26 MOTION to Appoint Counsel . MOTION to Appoint City of Melbourne Police Officers' Retirement System to serve as lead plaintiff(s) filed by City of Melbourne Police Officers' Retirement System, 23 MOTION to Appoin t Jim Welton to serve as lead plaintiff(s) filed by Jim Welton, 29 MOTION to Appoint Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System to serve as lead plaintiff(s) and for approval of its selection of cousel filed by Arkansas Publ ic Employees Retirement System. The Court grants APERS's motion to serve as lead plaintiff and denies all other motions to serve as lead plaintiff. The court appoints Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP as lead counsel and appoints Labaton Su charow LLP as liaison counsel. In accordance with the stipulation and order governing the next steps in this case, Dkt. 32, APERS is either to file and serve an amended complaint or designate the Complaint as the operative complaint in this case wit hin 60 days of this order-i.e. May 1, 2017. Defendants may then respond to the then-operative complaint under the schedule set forth in Dkt. 32-either 60 days after the filing of an amended complaint, or, if no amended complaint is filed, by June 30, 2017. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 2/28/2017) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
