Romero v. New Blue Flowers Gourmet Corp. et al
| Marcos Romero |
| New Blue Flowers Gourmet Corp., 74 Fifth Ave Market Corp., Valent & Cook At 57 Street Corp., Byung Nak Lim and Byung Sik Lim |
| 1:2016cv08753 |
| November 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| William H. Pauley |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
JUDGMENT: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff have judgment against Defendants, as identified herein, in the principal amount of $12,000, plus contractual penalties in the amount of $3,911.88, for a total of $15,911.88. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 3/8/2021) (ks)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER re: 58 Response to Motion filed by 74 Fifth Ave Market Corp., Valent & Cook At 57 Street Corp., New Blue Flowers Gourmet Corp. In light of this, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Brown is directed to serve a copy of his letter seek ing leave to withdraw on Defendants, together with a copy of this Order, by mail and email to their last known addresses, no later than January 8, 2021, and to file proof of such service on the Docket. 2. If any of the Defendants wish to be heard wit h respect to Brown Law's request to withdraw, then, no later than January 22, 2021, such Defendants should submit their responses to the Court, with a copy to Brown Law. If Defendants would like to email their responses to the Court, then they s hould contact my Chambers at (212) 805-4650 and leave a voicemail message, asking for email instructions and providing a telephone number where they may be reached so that such instructions may be given to them. Alternatively, Defendants may mail the ir responses directly to my Chambers at the following address: Hon. Debra Freeman, U.S. Magistrate Judge United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street, Room 1660 New York, New York 10007 Defendants' responses may be submitted ex parte; in other word s, they need not be served on counsel for Plaintiff. The Court, in its discretion, will determine whether any responses it receives from Defendants should be filed publicly or if they contain sensitive information that warrants their being placed und er seal. If, by January 22, 2021, the Court receives no objection from Defendants to Brown Law's request to withdraw, then the Court will likely grant that request as unopposed. 3. Defendants are cautioned, however, that a corporation may not pr oceed in an action before the Court without being represented by counsel. For this reason, if the Court permits Brown Law to withdraw, then Defendants will need to retain new counsel if they wish to oppose Plaintiff's pending motion to enforce t he settlement. If, by February 5, 2021, no attorney acting on Defendants' behalf files an opposition to Plaintiff's motion, then the Court will proceed to decide that motion based on Plaintiff's submissions alone. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on 1/4/2021) All counsel (via ECF) (kv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
