Akinde v. New York City Health and Hospital Corporation et al
| Oludotun Akinde |
| New York City Health and Hospital Corporation and Shari Singleton |
| 1:2016cv08882 |
| November 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Westchester |
| Unassigned |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 106 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment on all of Plaintiff''s remaining claims. filed by New York City Health and Hospital Corporation. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 191 5(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' moti ons for summary judgment are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiffs, to terminate all pending motions, to enter judgment in favor of Defendants, and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 3/29/2022) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER granting 126 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application granted. The deadline for Defendant to file its reply is extended to July 29, 2021. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 126. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 6/28/2021) (rro)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER: On April 7, 2021, the Court held a conference with the parties. At the conference, Defendants represented that they had initiated searches for electronic and tangible documents in the possession of various custodians. As discussed on the reco rd, Defendants are directed to provide Plaintiff with all responsive documents resulting from these searches within fourteen days of the entry of this order. Defendants are directed to email a copy of this order to Plaintiff. The Court reminds Mr. Akinde that he may register as an ECF user. By doing so, he can assure that he receives documents filed in this matter as soon as they are posted to the docket. The form Mr. Akinde must complete to register is available at the following link: https:/ /nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018- 06/proseconsentecfnotice-final.pdf. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff by first class and certified mail. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 4/7/2021) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER: On April 5, 2021, the Court held two conferences with the parties. As discussed on the record, the Court will hold a teleconference in this matter on April 7, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. The parties are directed to the Court's Emergency Rules in Light of COVID-19, which can be found on the Court's website, for dial-in information and other relevant instructions. The parties are specifically directed to comply with Rule 2(C) of the Court's Emergency Rules. Defendants are directed t o email a copy of this order to Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff by first class and certified mail., (Telephone Conference set for 4/7/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Gregory H. Woods.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 4/5/2021) (nb) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER: On January 12, 2021, the Court held a status conference in this case. For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant is directed to produce Plaintiff's personnel file, hard copy files left in Plaintiff's office cabinet, and resp onsive electronic files by March 5, 2021. Defendant's request for leave to file a motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 88, is granted. The deadline for Defendant to file and serve its motion for summary judgment is April 5, 2021. Plaintiff&# 039;s opposition is due within six weeks after service of Defendant's motion; Defendant's reply, if any, is due within two weeks days after service of Plaintiff's opposition. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 4/5/2021.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 1/13/2021) (rro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 85 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference; granting 85 Letter Motion for Extension of Time. Application granted. The status conference scheduled for January 4, 2021 is adjourned to January 12, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. The joint status letter requested in the case management plan and scheduling order, Dkt. No. 50, is due no later than January 5, 2021. The deadline for the parties to file motions for summary judgment, if any, is extended to January 19, 2021. In advance of filing any motion for summary judgment, the parties must file a pre-motion letter as required by the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases. Except as expressly modified by this order, the case management pl an entered by the Court, Dkt. No. 50, remains in full force and effect. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. ( Status Conference set for 1/12/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Gregory H. Woods., Motions due by 1/19/2021.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 12/15/2020) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER: The status conference scheduled for July 9, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. is adjourned to July 22, 2020 at 4:30 p.m. The joint status letter described in the Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, Dkt. No. 50, is due no later than July 15, 2020. In accordance with the Court's Emergency Rules related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the status conference will be held via conference call. The parties are directed to the Court's Emergency Rules, which are available on the Cour t's website, for dial-in numbers for the conference and other relevant information. Defendants are directed to serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff, and to file proof of such service. ( Status Conference set for 7/22/2020 at 04:30 PM before Judge Gregory H. Woods.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 4/1/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 33 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. filed by New York City Health and Hospital Corporation, Shari Singleton. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs due process c laim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is denied. Plaintiff's Title VII and ADA claims against Ms. Singleton are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff is denied leave to replead these claims. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Title VII and ADA claims against NYC HHC is denied. Plaintiff's claims for discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and for violation of his equal protection rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed with leave to replead. Plaintiffs NYSH RL and NYCHRL claims are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). Any amended complaint must be filed no later than 30 days after the date of this order. The Court requests that counsel for Defendants mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and provide Plaintiff with copies of any unpublished cases cited in this decision pursuant to Local Rule of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York 7.2. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 33. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/13/2019) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
