Ogirri v. Colvin

Ogirri v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Frederick Ogirri
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	1:2016cv09143
Filed:	November 23, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Alison J. Nathan
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 11, 2019	Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER: For these reasons, the motion is granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close docket number 19. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 7/11/2019) (jca)
February 28, 2018	Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 14 CROSS MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Frederick Ogirri. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Ogirri& #039;s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and remands the case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the ALJ should evaluate Dr. Tses opinion as that of a treating physician and reevaluate the weight that should be af forded to the opinion based on the considerations outlined above. To the extent that the ALJ's conclusion remains that "little," rather than controlling, weight should be afforded, the ALJ should provide a comprehensive analysis setting forth good reasons for the weight assigned. The ALJ should also reevaluate Ogirri's credibility in light of all the relevant medical and other evidence. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 2/28/2018) (js)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 11, 2019

Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER: For these reasons, the motion is granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close docket number 19. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 7/11/2019) (jca)

February 28, 2018

Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 14 CROSS MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 8 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . filed by Frederick Ogirri. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Ogirri& #039;s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and remands the case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the ALJ should evaluate Dr. Tses opinion as that of a treating physician and reevaluate the weight that should be af forded to the opinion based on the considerations outlined above. To the extent that the ALJ's conclusion remains that "little," rather than controlling, weight should be afforded, the ALJ should provide a comprehensive analysis setting forth good reasons for the weight assigned. The ALJ should also reevaluate Ogirri's credibility in light of all the relevant medical and other evidence. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James L. Cott on 2/28/2018) (js)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ogirri v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick Ogirri
Represented By:	Charles E Binder
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?