Alfonso v. Mantuscello

Alfonso v. Mantuscello

Petitioner:	Jonathan Alfonso
Respondent:	Daniel Mantuscello
Case Number:	1:2016cv09399
Filed:	December 5, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	Greene
Presiding Judge:	Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 5, 2017	Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 14 Report and Recommendations 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by Daniel Mantuscello: The Court has carefully reviewed the thorough and well-reasoned R&R and finds that there is no clear error of law. Ac cordingly, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Furthermore, Petitioner has waived his right to appeal because he has not filed any objections to the R&R. (R&R at 8). The Clerk's Office is directed to mail a c opy of this Order to Petitioner at his last known address: Jonathan Alfonso, #13A3003, Eastern C.F., P.O. Box 338, Napanoch, New York, New York 12458, and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 6/5/2017) (jwh) Modified on 6/5/2017 (jwh).

Date Filed

Document Text

June 5, 2017

Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 14 Report and Recommendations 11 Motion to Dismiss filed by Daniel Mantuscello: The Court has carefully reviewed the thorough and well-reasoned R&R and finds that there is no clear error of law. Ac cordingly, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Furthermore, Petitioner has waived his right to appeal because he has not filed any objections to the R&R. (R&R at 8). The Clerk's Office is directed to mail a c opy of this Order to Petitioner at his last known address: Jonathan Alfonso, #13A3003, Eastern C.F., P.O. Box 338, Napanoch, New York, New York 12458, and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 6/5/2017) (jwh) Modified on 6/5/2017 (jwh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alfonso v. Mantuscello
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jonathan Alfonso
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Daniel Mantuscello
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?