Jackson v. Marks et al
| Nahshon Jackson |
| Lawrence K. Marks, Tina M. Stanford, Jeff McKoy and Jeffery A. Hale |
| 1:2016cv09702 |
| December 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Orange |
| Colleen McMahon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER denying 73 Motion for relieving Plaintiff from the August 20, 2021 judgment on the grounds that it was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation and is void as a matter of law. The Court has considered the remainder of Plaintiff's a rguments and, even construing them liberally, concludes that they are without merit. Plaintiff's motion to be relieved from the judgment is therefore DENIED. This resolves Dkt. No. 73. The Clerk of Court is respectfully ordered to mail a cop y of this order to the pro se Plaintiff and note that mailing on the public docket. The Court finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 3/22/2022) (vfr) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
71
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 70 Memorandum & Opinion, in favor of Jeff McKoy, Shelley Mallozzi, Tina M. Stanford against Nahshon Jackson. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opin ion and Order dated August 19, 2021, the Court overrules the Plaintiff's objections and adopts in full Judge Aaron's Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion to amend is DENIED; accordingly, the case is closed. The Court finds pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 8/20/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt)
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER re: 63 MOTION to Amend/Correct 2 Complaint. filed by Nahshon Jackson. For the reasons stated above, the Court overrules the Plaintiff's objections and adopts in full Judge Aaron's Report and Recomm endation. Plaintiffs motion to amend is DENIED. This resolves Dkt. No. 63. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close the case. The Clerk of Court is ordered to mail a copy of this order to the pro se Plaintiff and n ote that mailing on the public docket. The Court finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/19/2021) (vfr) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court has considered the remainder of Plaintiff's arguments and, even construing them liberally, concludes that they are without merit. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is therefore DENIED. This resolves Dkt. No s. 55 and 56. The Clerk of Court is ordered to mail a copy of this order to the pro se Plaintiff and note that mailing on the public docket. The Court finds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. re: 55 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 54 Memorandum & Opinion filed by Nahshon Jackson. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/20/2020) (rjm) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER with respect to 55 Motion for Reconsideration. Accordingly, Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed by February 6, 2020. If no reply is filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion fully briefed. If Plaintiff instead wishes to withdraw his motion, he shall inform the Court by that date. This order will be mailed to Plaintiff and that mailing will be noted on the public docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/6/2020) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (kv)
|
|
Filing
54
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons given above, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Mr. Jackson's Fourteenth Amendment and Free Exercise Clause claims are DISMISSED without prejudice, while his First Amendment right to petition claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. Finally, Mr. Jackson's motion for default judgment is DENIED with prejudice. If Mr. Jackson wishes to file an amended complaint as to the claims dismissed without prejudice, he must do so within 30 days of receiving notice of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of these claims with prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis st atus is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). To ensure that a copy of this Opinion and Order reach Mr. Jackson, the Court will mail a copy to both of the following addresses and note the mailing on the public docket: Nahshon Jackson, CC # 18006068, Nassau County Jail, 100 Carman Ave., East Meadow, NY 11554. Nahshon Jackson, 822 Prospect Ave., Apt. 2G, Westbury, NY 11590. SO ORDERED. re: 29 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Shelley Mallozzi, Tina M. Stanford, Jeff McKoy. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/26/2019) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rjm).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
