Feuer-Goldstein, Inc. v. Michael Hill Franchise Pty. Ltd.
Feuer-Goldstein, Inc. |
Michael Hill Franchise Pty. Ltd. and Michael Hill, LLC. |
1:2016cv09987 |
December 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
P. Kevin Castel |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 113 OPINION AND ORDER re: 104 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Strike , Related Briefing Schedule and for Oral Argument on Summary Judgment addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from David A. Lowe dated 09/19/2018 filed by Mich ael Hill Franchise Pty. Ltd., Michael Hill, LLC., 83 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael Hill Franchise Pty. Ltd., Michael Hill, LLC., 98 CROSS MOTION to Strike And Opposition to Summary Judgment Motion.CRO SS MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Feuer-Goldstein, Inc. For the aforementioned reasons, defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's claims in their entirety is GRANTED. Plaintiff's cross-mo tion to strike and defendant's motion for oral argument are DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motions (Docs. 83, 98, 104), enter final judgment in favor of defendants, and close the case. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 3/27/2019) (mro) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.