In Re:Application of Consellior SAS for an Order to Take Discover Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782
1:2016mc00400 |
November 4, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Part One |
Other |
M 77 Application to have subpoena issued to person living in this district re: action in foreign cou |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 OPINION & ORDER re: 5 MOTION to Quash 11/08/2016 ORDER, Docket Entry #4 of Hamilton South and John Demsey filed by Hamilton South, John Demsey; 20 MOTION to Compel Hamilton South and John Demsey to Comply with Subpoenas < i> filed by Application of Consellior SAS for an Order to Take Discover Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782. For the foregoing reasons, Consellior's motion to compel is granted and South and Demsey's motion to quash is denied. The parties are directed to proceed with the depositions of South and Demsey in conformity with this Opinion and Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion pending at ECF No. 20. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 2/2/2017) PART 1 (cla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: In Re:Application of Consellior SAS for an Order to Take Discover Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.