Yimby, Inc. v. Fedak
Yimby, Inc. |
Nikolai Fedak and New York Yimby LLC |
1:2017cv00223 |
January 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Paul A. Crotty |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 63 OPINION AND ORDER. The Court holds Yimby and George in civil contempt of its February 16 Order requiring the payment of $30,000 and the turnover of the original Employment Agreement. They must pay the reasonable costs and attorney's fees Movants have incurred in pursuing this contempt order. Movants are directed to submit documentation detailing their attorney's fees and costs associated with pursuing this contempt order. Further, the Court denies Yimby's request for a s tay of the Court's February 16 and March 6 Orders pending appeal. A conference to discuss a cost bond in connection with Yimby's appeal, and any other open matters, will be held on July 6, 2017 at 11:15 am. So Ordered. (Status Conference set for 7/6/2017 at 11:15 AM before Judge Paul A. Crotty.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 6/22/17) (yv) |
Filing 39 OPINION & ORDER re: 35 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 33 Order filed by Yimby, Inc. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and for an additional 90 days to make payment to Defendants is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket 35. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Crotty on 3/6/2017) (anc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.