Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd. et al v. Patriarch Partners, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd., Zohar II 2005-1, Ltd. and Zohar III, Ltd.
Defendant: Patriarch Partners, LLC, Patriarch Partners VIII, LLC, Patriarch Partners XIV, LLC, Patriarch Partners XV, LLC, Octaluna LLC, Octaluna II LLC, Octaluna III LLC, ARK II CLO 2001-1, LLC, ARK Investment Partners II, L.P. and Lynn Tilton
Case Number: 1:2017cv00307
Filed: January 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: William H. Pauley
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 237 ORDER: All parties to this action, i.e. plaintiff, defendant, third-party plaintiff, third-party defendant, counterclaimant, or counterclaim-defendant, shall meet and confer on the status of all claims in this action and file a report to the Court by December 21, 2022. The conferral and reporting requirement shall not apply to any party as to whom a stay by operation of section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code applies. The status report shall identify all claims that remain pending in this action and report on their status, including those stayed by reason of the Court's Opinion and Order of September 29, 2021. Any claim not so identified will be dismissed with prejudice. As to any claim not stayed (1) by reason of the bankruptcy stay; or (2) the Court's Opinion and Order of September 29, 2021, the report to the Court shall identify those actions necessary to bring the claim to conclusion. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 11/28/2022) (rro)
September 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 233 ORDER granting 232 Letter Motion to Stay re: 232 LETTER MOTION to Stay re: 227 Case Management Plan,,, addressed to Judge P. Kevin Castel from Akiva Shapiro dated September 21, 2022. All deadlines are stayed until Novem ber 11 in contemplation of settlement. If the action is not settled by then, the parties shall file on or before November 11 a comprehensive schedule to bring the action to trial. he November 25 conference is adjourned to November 28 at 11:00 a.m. SO ORDERED.. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/23/2022) (kv)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 231 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE EXCHANGE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/02/2022) (ama)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 219 ORDER: granting 218 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application GRANTED in its entirety. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/08/2021) (ama)
October 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 217 ORDER: It was appropriate for the Court to sub silentio deny the Patriarch Parties' pro forma request to amend on page 80 of their Memorandum. TechnoMarine SA v. Giftports, Inc., 758 F.3d 493, 505 (2d Cir. 2014) ("A plaintiff need not be g iven leave to amend if it fails to specify... how amendment would cure the pleading deficiencies in its complaint."). Upon reconsideration, the Court adheres to its denial of the Patriarch Parties' request to amend. If the Patriarch Partie s wish to move to amend, they may file a motion by October 15, 2021, annexing a proposed pleading marked to show changes and explaining why the amendments would not be futile. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED., ( Motions due by 10/15/2021.) (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 10/07/2021) (ama)
September 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 214 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 189 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Halcyon Capital Management LP, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A., Credit Value Partners, LP, Varde Partners, Inc., 190 THIRD PARTY MOTION to Dismiss Third-Party Complaint filed by Alvarez & Marsa l Zohar Management, LLC. All claims against "MBIA Inc." are dismissed. The Third-Party Defendants' motions are granted in part and denied in part. Counts 1 through 12 are dismissed, Count 13 is stayed pending certain determinations of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, Counts 14 through 17 are dismissed, Counts 18 and 19 are dismissed except for the books-and-records-related claims, Count 20 is dismissed, and Counts 21 and 22 are stayed pending certain determinations of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court. The Clerk is respectfully directed to administratively terminate the motions (Doc 189 & 190), subject to reinstatement as to Counts 13, 21 and 22 at the request of aparty after the Delaware Bankruptcy Court rules on certain underlying issues. SO ORDERED., MBIA Insurance Corporation, MBIA Insurance Corporation, MBIA Inc. and MBIA Inc. terminated. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 9/29/2021) (ama)
September 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 169 OPINION AND ORDER re: 154 MOTION to Transfer Case / Third-Party Defendants MBIA Inc.'s, MBIA Insurance Corporation's, Credit Value Partners, LP's, Halcyon Capital Management LP's, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A.'s and V arde Partners, Inc.'s Notice filed by Halcyon Capital Management LP, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A., MBIA Insurance Corporation, MBIA Inc., Credit Value Partners, LP, Varde Partners, Inc., 151 MOTION to Transfer Case - Zohar Fu nd's Notice of Motion to Transfer Venue. filed by Zohar II 2005-1, Ltd., Zohar III, Ltd., Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd.. For the foregoing reasons, the Zohar Funds motion to transfer this case is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at ECF Nos. 151 and 154. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 9/18/2020) (kv)
February 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 125 OPINION & ORDER: The parties having appeared for a pre-motion conference on February 28, 2018, this Court enters the following briefing schedule on consent: 1. Plaintiff Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd., et al., and the Third Party Defendants shal l file their opposition to Third Party Plaintiff Patriarch Partners, LLC, et al.'s memorandum of law in support of Third-Party Complaint Jurisdiction (ECF No. 117) by March 16, 2018. 2. Patriarch Partners shall file its Reply by March 30, 2 018. 3. Plaintiff and Third Party Defendants shall file their Surreply by April 10, 2018. Absent this Court's determination that oral argument is necessary, the motion shall be resolved on submission. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 2/28/2018) (mro)
December 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 105 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 53 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Patriarch Partners XV, LLC, Patriarch Partners XIV, LLC, ARK Investment Partners II, L.P., For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. Consistent with the Joint Sti pulation and Order dated December 15, 2017, Zohar and the Third Party Defendants should respond to Defendants' Third Party Complaint by January 12, 2018. Separately, Defendants shall provide an explanation as to why this Court should retain juri sdiction over their claims in the Third Party Complaint and why their third-party claims qualify as an impleader action under Rule 14 by no later than January 26, 2018. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 12/29/2017) (ama)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd. et al v. Patriarch Partners, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd.
Represented By: Blair Alexander Adams
Represented By: Michael Barry Carlinsky
Represented By: Jonathan Pickhardt
Represented By: Ellison Sylvina Ward Merkel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zohar II 2005-1, Ltd.
Represented By: Blair Alexander Adams
Represented By: Michael Barry Carlinsky
Represented By: Jonathan Pickhardt
Represented By: Ellison Sylvina Ward Merkel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zohar III, Ltd.
Represented By: Blair Alexander Adams
Represented By: Michael Barry Carlinsky
Represented By: Jonathan Pickhardt
Represented By: Ellison Sylvina Ward Merkel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patriarch Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patriarch Partners VIII, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patriarch Partners XIV, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patriarch Partners XV, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Octaluna LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Octaluna II LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Octaluna III LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARK II CLO 2001-1, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARK Investment Partners II, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lynn Tilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?