Atlas Air, Inc. et al v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters et al
| Atlas Air, Inc. and Southern Air, Inc. |
| International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Professionals Association of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 1224 and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division |
| 7:2017cv00903 |
| February 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Westchester |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Railway Labor Act |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
OPINION & ORDER re: 35 AMENDED MOTION for Summary Judgment (Notice of Plaintiffs' Amended Motion For Summary Judgment and to Compel Arbitration). filed by Atlas Air, Inc., Southern Air, Inc., 41 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Airline Division, Airline Professionals Association of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 1224, International Brotherhood of Teamsters. For the reasons stated abov e, the Court GRANTS plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and to compel arbitration at ECF No. 35 and DENIES defendants' motion for summary judgment at ECF No. 41. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all open motions and terminate this action. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 3/13/2018) (kgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
