Alpha Capital Anstalt v. Real Goods Solar, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Alpha Capital Anstalt
Defendant: Real Goods Solar, Inc. and Roth Capital Partners, LLC
Case Number: 1:2017cv01186
Filed: February 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: John G. Koeltl
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities/Exchanges
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 76 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 55 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Alpha Capital Anstalt, 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Real Goods Solar, Inc., 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Roth Ca pital Partners, LLC. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to liability against RGS (ECF No. 55) is DENIED in its entirety. RGS's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 59) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN P ART. Those portions of Counts I and II that allege a breach of the 50.1% Requirement are dismissed. Roth Capital's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 63) is GRANTED in its entirety, and Counts III and IV of the Amended Complaint are di smissed. Within 45 days of the date of this Opinion and Order, Plaintiff and RGS shall submit a Joint Pretrial Order9 in advance of a trial to be held regarding the only remaining portions of Counts I and II of the Amended Complaint: the alleged b reach by RGS of the Equal Treatment and Disproportionate Impact Provisions, and any damages that proximately flowed therefrom. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Defendant Roth Capital Partners, LLC as a party in this case, and to amend the caption in this case to read as follows: Alpha Capital Anstalt v. Real Goods Solar, Inc, and as further set forth in this order. Roth Capital Partners, LLC terminated. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 4/25/2018) (ap)
December 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 52 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, RGS's Letter-Motion for a protective order (ECF No. 49) is granted. If Alpha Capital wishes to take the deposition of Mr. Lacey, it must do so in accordance with this Order. The deposition must be completed by January 19, 2018. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 12/6/2017) (mro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alpha Capital Anstalt v. Real Goods Solar, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alpha Capital Anstalt
Represented By: David Scott Hoffner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Real Goods Solar, Inc.
Represented By: Barbara L. Seniawski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roth Capital Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?