RCC Ventures, LLC v. Brandtone, Ltd
| RCC Ventures, LLC |
| Brandtone, Ltd and Brandtone Holdings, Ltd. |
| 1:2017cv01585 |
| March 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Gregory H. Woods |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER. Plaintiff RCC Ventures, LLC's motion for reconsideration is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to serve Defendant Brandtone Holdings Limited in a manner permitted under the Federal Rules. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all motions, adjourn all pending dates, and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/22/17) (yv)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER re: 20 MOTION for Order to Show Cause for Default Judgment. Accordingly, RCC's motion for default judgment is DENIED, the order to show cause issued by the Court on July 14, 2017 (ECF No. 19) is VACATED, and the hearing sche duled for August 11, 2017 is adjourned. In addition, RCC is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, no later than August 4, 2017, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to effectuate service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h)(2). RCC is further ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on Brandtone Holdings Limited and to file proof of service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 7/28/2017) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
