Peerless Network, Inc. v. Blitz Telecom Consulting, LLC et al
| Peerless Network, Inc. |
| Blitz Telecom Consulting, LLC, Local Access LLC and Neil J Rosenblit |
| 1:2017cv01725 |
| March 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
OPINION AND ORDER: re: 23 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Improper Venue, Failure to State Claim and to Transfer filed by Blitz Telecom Consulting, LLC, Neil J Rosenblit, Local Access LLC, 34 MOTION to Dismiss. MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. MOTION to Transfer Case. MOTION to Change Venue. MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Blitz Telecom Consulting, LLC, Robert M Russell, Neil J Rosenblit, Local Access LLC. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' moti on to dismiss or transfer for improper venue is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at Docket Numbers 23 and 34. It is further ORDERED that this action be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.1, the Clerk shall, upon the expiration of seven days, effectuate the transfer of the case to the Middle District of Florida. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 3/26/2018) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
